+- International Simulation Football League (https://forums.sim-football.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://forums.sim-football.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Graphics (https://forums.sim-football.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+---- Forum: GFX Submissions (https://forums.sim-football.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=40)
+---- Thread: Official Arbitration Thread (/showthread.php?tid=21442)
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - Liter - 04-25-2022
Submission date: 4-7-2022
Submission link
Which ones: the 2nd and 3rd one, take AS LONG as you'd like.
The Grade is already in order, and already bumped up the 4th one to 3
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - br0_0ker - 04-25-2022
hows the last one 2/7 either...
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - Pizza-faith - 05-10-2022
________________________________
![[Image: ktL0D3j.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ktL0D3j.png)
18 players in this, 16/18 had colors/logos changed
5/7
__________________________________________________
![[Image: 5FDFxnT.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/5FDFxnT.gif)
4/7
Was most surprised this is a 4/7, think it looks simple but is a clean, gif animated signature.
Thank you for your time
@Pizza-faith ok so for the first one i'm going to bump up to 5.5, i know you do a lot with 18 players but sorry that's as high i can give you cause you really need to step up again, your color swap is great!!! but still the placement of logo and there's still nfl logo replaced and how to make the logo mixed well with the jersey is the one that missing
and for the second one i know it's clean, but still there are no swap you used , i'm already bump down that one to 3 but i think gonna bump it up again to 4, if you think this can get more reach me in discord
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - DREAMSLOTH - 05-24-2022
Hi! I need some help arbitrating media, not graphics -- couldn't find a thread to make that happen though.
Submission Date: 2022 April 28
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39093&pid=587246#pid587246
Contested Sig(s): The media payout was based on the forum post, not the entirety of the proposal which was hosted on an external page (see here: https://aries.notion.site/S35-Tijuana-Ultimus-Proposal-7d9721296f25421f9a2173fea7045527). I compiled everything together on a public Notion site because it was easier for me to collect all the graphics in one place. I realize that makes it a little more difficult to grade, but I was hoping it would still count as if it were a media post on the site.
I'm happy to help resolve this in any way that will get the full word count graded, not just the forum post directing to the external page.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
Cheers,
dreamSloth
cc @soevil for context / support and @Crunk for review
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - JKortesi81 - 05-24-2022
(05-24-2022, 12:11 PM)dreamSloth Wrote: Hi! I need some help arbitrating media, not graphics -- couldn't find a thread to make that happen though.
Submission Date: 2022 April 28
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39093&pid=587246#pid587246
Contested Sig(s): The media payout was based on the forum post, not the entirety of the proposal which was hosted on an external page (see here: https://aries.notion.site/S35-Tijuana-Ultimus-Proposal-7d9721296f25421f9a2173fea7045527). I compiled everything together on a public Notion site because it was easier for me to collect all the graphics in one place. I realize that makes it a little more difficult to grade, but I was hoping it would still count as if it were a media post on the site.
I'm happy to help resolve this in any way that will get the full word count graded, not just the forum post directing to the external page.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
Cheers,
dreamSloth
cc @soevil for context / support and @Crunk for review
"Arbitration for Media" lol.
It's pretty easy here: Post everything on the forum. That's what we grade.
I don't care about external links. They're not on the site.
You were graded on what you posted, as everyone is. That's how its been for 5 years, if not longer. Feel free to edit your post, and then you can bother @Crunk with it.
Source: Media Head for 6,346 years.
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - Liter - 05-25-2022
My GFX post was made on 5/2/2022
https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39195&pid=589389#pid589389
I am contesting the grade for the Fred Edison SIG .
I believe it is a 7/7. It looks better than most 6/7's and a lot of 7/7's. When I got a 6/7 on my last Fred Edison sig, I received a list of reasons why it didn't get a 7. All of those reasons were dealt with and fixed for this sig, so I'm wondering why I'm still receiving the same grade. Also, a 7/7 grade was given to a recent graphic that did not remove the Vikings logo from the helmet. I removed and replaced all the NFL logos from my render and still got a worse grade.
ok so after what happen before i upgrade the payment for the sig, the payment is higher than before, so me and my team will be harsh at grading, your why your sig only get 6 not 7 cause in the old payment your sig will get 7 but the new one its only 6 cause you still missing some element, first the the logo on the helmet not really mixed well with the helmet, and from what i see you still missing some effect that can make your sig a 7. if you said that there's a recent graphic that get 7 but the maker did not remove the vikings logo, give me the link and i'll bump it down, cause my last grading is the one that gonna paid to you at the end
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - br0_0ker - 06-05-2022
Submission Date: 6/5
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39661
Contested Sig(s): the only one
Graded 2/7: "Graphics that receive this grade show some effort to be more than a meme, however the changes to the render, text and/or background are minimal or non-existent"
Requested change at least to 3/7: "Graphics that receive this grade show off that the creator has some experience creating graphics. The tools that photoshop or other editing apps provides are starting to be used, but inexperience is show by renders being poorly cut, text not blending with, and/or original logos still being visible on the render. This can also include minimal changes to the background of the submission and an unaesthetic text/font."
For reference, here is the unedited render image I used:
![[Image: RaidersBroncos_091311~1.jpg]](https://archive.sltrib.com/images/2011/0913/RaidersBroncos_091311~1.jpg)
Things to note on render:
- full cut, while rough, completely pulled the player from the crowd/background
- full color swap with color rush colors (requested)
- number switch from 45 to 49 (with color swap)
While there are no logos on the player render, I included multiple logo cuts in the image, and should not be graded down because the player render did not have an image to swap.
For reference, here are other submissions of comparable quality/difficulty:
Will Nightingale 3.5/7: basic render cut on simple background with overlaid text and simple logo swap/placement
Gribbuh Fistah 3/7: basic render cut with simple color swap and single image overlaid on simple text overlay
WhatAmUS 3/7, 4/7, 4/7: simple render cut with basic color swap and simple logo swaps, overlaid on a simple background with simple text overlay
I believe this sig is at least on the same level as some of these, please elaborate on the differences if my appeal is rejected.
Thanks.
"all good, already bump it up ot 3"
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - br0_0ker - 06-17-2022
Submission Date: 6/12
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39792
Contested Sig(s): first
graded 2.5, here are other sigs that were a 2.5:
https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39794
https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39761
https://forums.sim-football.com/showthread.php?tid=39743
Already bump it up to 3, sorry if it takes forever
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - br0_0ker - 07-20-2022
bump @kentakira
RE: Official Arbitration Thread - TwoSocks - 07-26-2022
Date of Submission: 7/17
Submission link
Contested submission(s): both
I feel like they both deserve at least a 5+, especially the first one. Both Jersey swaps were quite good in my opinion. Also the blending with text and renders is visually pleasing and multiple layers are contained in each bg.
Done bump it up