What I want added: I really think we should look at the idea of having league minimums at some point based on years played in the NSFL. Rookie contracts could be a part of a unified structure so that players don't lose interest in the league simply because they can't afford anything. This comes with the assumption that the league office takes a look at the salary cap each year and adjusts it accordingly. Star quarterbacks who have been in the league for 5 years won't be able to take contracts that pay about the same as a NSFL rookie. There may be a more competitive free agency process that creates more intrigue in the league and keeps people engaged over the off season.
What I want removed: The current length of regression. From what I understand, it's primarily based upon an assumed average to make things fair across multiple positions. The time and attachment someone could form to their player might go pretty quickly when they have six NSFL seasons and at most three into regression. Simplify it and either loosen up the current stages of regression and start at 5%, or push regression back to 10 seasons. Maybe exclude the first DSFL season when considering the regression number so it's truly 7 seasons in the NSFL. The current scale seems a little harsh for the guys who can't earn as much or want to hang around with their team.
What I like: The TPE opportunities are fantastic. There are plenty of them to build your player weekly, from predictions to all kinds of point tasks. I'm especially fond of the prediction tasks; I've had to learn a lot about the teams in order to make reasonably informed picks. It's extremely easy to keep active and write a quick 150-200 words for some TPE. That number doesn't even include the eight TPE from each piece of equipment. Equipment is extremely affordable with a few media pieces that are on a decent grading scale. The weekly amounts of TPE that are available reward those who are active and bother to improve their player.
Quote:Word Count: 120
What I want removed: The current length of regression. From what I understand, it's primarily based upon an assumed average to make things fair across multiple positions. The time and attachment someone could form to their player might go pretty quickly when they have six NSFL seasons and at most three into regression. Simplify it and either loosen up the current stages of regression and start at 5%, or push regression back to 10 seasons. Maybe exclude the first DSFL season when considering the regression number so it's truly 7 seasons in the NSFL. The current scale seems a little harsh for the guys who can't earn as much or want to hang around with their team.
Quote:Word Count: 113
What I like: The TPE opportunities are fantastic. There are plenty of them to build your player weekly, from predictions to all kinds of point tasks. I'm especially fond of the prediction tasks; I've had to learn a lot about the teams in order to make reasonably informed picks. It's extremely easy to keep active and write a quick 150-200 words for some TPE. That number doesn't even include the eight TPE from each piece of equipment. Equipment is extremely affordable with a few media pieces that are on a decent grading scale. The weekly amounts of TPE that are available reward those who are active and bother to improve their player.
Quote:Word Count: 109