* WR Bailey Cook Requests Trade

[Bzerkap]

Question: are there people who can search PMs and find out if there was contact? 

I agree there is reason for concern, but unless there was PRIVATE contact then there's no violation.  Maybe the tampering rule should be expanded to include public and/or to prevent GMs from responding to player-initiated contact?

Maybe the main tampering issue is simply that there are too many ways around the tampering rule?

I think you can check PMs. Not 100% sure though

[Stormblessed]

Question: are there people who can search PMs and find out if there was contact? 

I agree there is reason for concern, but unless there was PRIVATE contact then there's no violation.  Maybe the tampering rule should be expanded to include public and/or to prevent GMs from responding to player-initiated contact?

Maybe the main tampering issue is simply that there are too many ways around the tampering rule?

There is no way to prove it and thats the problem. Just like the Otters thing. No way to prove what CLEARLY happened. Need to eliminate the rule.

Then elevate me to League Ref. Pay me $10 million a season to adjudicate. Pray I accept the job.

[Stormblessed]

I think you can check PMs. Not 100% sure though

Can't check off-site though. That's why it's impossible to prove. Unless the commish snitches on himself lol

[Bzerkap]

Can't check off-site though. That's why it's impossible to prove. Unless the commish snitches on himself lol

lol or GMs. So you can check PMs on site? I'm not 100% familiar with jcink

[RainDelay]

Can't check off-site though. That's why it's impossible to prove. Unless the commish snitches on himself lol

I assure you @Ballerstorm and I had NO contact regarding this, in fact, he was probably more than surprised to see this post.

[Stormblessed]

I assure you @Ballerstorm and I had NO contact regarding this, in fact, he was probably more than surprised to see this post.

Uh huh. This is way less credible as it is impossible to prove.

Also, what about your friend on the Wraiths? You guys never spoke about playing together?

I'm not attacking you, I think the rule is stupid.

[RainDelay]

Uh huh. This is way less credible as it is impossible to prove.

Also, what about your friend on the Wraiths? You guys never spoke about playing together?

I'm not attacking you, I think the rule is stupid.

He was traded like four hours ago, from the Cats.

We talk all the time, and yes, sticking together on site has been a topic of discussion.


And I feel that you're not attacking me, I'm just trying to explain myself so I don't have any unnecessary allegations against me.

[Stormblessed]

He was traded like four hours ago, from the Cats.

We talk all the time, and yes, sticking together on site has been a topic of discussion.

I personally appreciate you admitting the tampering.

Now it's time to get rid of the dumb rule.

[RainDelay]

I personally appreciate you admitting the tampering.

Now it's time to get rid of the dumb rule.

But is talking to my best friend in person about the site I brought him to really under the rule?

[Stormblessed]

But is talking to my best friend in person about the site I brought him to really under the rule?

Technically, yes. As you are on different teams when you spoke about playing on the same team, that is a violation.