(02-26-2018, 09:40 AM)bovovovo Wrote:You don't think cases of possible rule-breaking should be looked at on a case by case basis before dealing out the punishment?I didn't misspeak and you're not misinterpreting. I think there should be no cases of "possible" rule breaking. It either clearly and explicitly broke a rule, as can be pointed to exactly, or if it's ambiguous, then it did not break a rule (no matter what it is or how "bad") and a rule must be created or reworded to address it.
I'm guessing you misspoke about this, right? Or maybe I'm misinterpreting?
Clearly you guys do not agree. I understand that, just want to clarify what exactly my stance is.