(04-18-2018, 07:06 AM)AdamS Wrote:I will say that in my experience its been GMs who are against pro-activity rather than HO
Now you're trying to play both sides. You've been HO for like 10 minutes but you were a GM voting down pro-activity for multiple seasons. Yes, I see the summit voting every season and I think its ridiculous but I know why GMs don't want to make things "difficult" for themselves. At the same time, HO should recognize certain issues and make an executive decision.
I think Dwyer mentioned salary changes got 3/5 vote in favor from HO but you are still needing 75% GM vote which is never going to happen. Meanwhile, GMs spending $22-30 million on OL bots. Baltimore spent $22.5M on 5 OL bots and only $11.5M on the remaining offensive skill positions. There's a lot of discussion ahead but I think we can agree that something needs to change.
[div align=center][/select]
[div align=center]
[div align=center]