1 like:
I like the community of this league a lot. Sometimes I'll just be browsing the NSFL discord during the middle of work or browsing the forums and i'll see a joke about dermot or something beaver said about not being a fraud (which he clearly is) and I'll break out laughing. I honestly love both the Portland and Colorado locker room, the people here are awesome and I just love hanging out with this community. Even many of the media posts on the site are awesome and I love reading through analysis about players and what not. Also dermot sucks, just wanted to say that and definitely not for fluff
110
1 Removal
I think the biggest thing that needs to be addressed is the whole position switching from defensive lineman who weighs 300 pounds to a perennial all star quarterback with NO hiccups. For 1 the current system needs to be removed and replaced with a new system. I will get to that new system in the addition section but the current system has got to go. It just doesn't make any sense that a cornerback can go from all star corner to all star quarterback in one season. That is just ridiculous and it really hurts the immersion for me, at least in my experience.
1 addition
Now about the idea I had for position switching. I feel like we still need to allow people to switch positions, that way they aren't stuck in a horrible position and wanting to switch, or in the Libertys case on the brink of a playoff run when their quarterback goes inactive. My idea is that players can switch to and from any position, defensive tackle to quarterback even, however there will be a penalty. Although this plan still allows people to switch, there will be a bigger penalty than right now (which is virtually nonexistent lets be honest). My idea is that when a player switches, they can apply 66% (2/3rd) of their tpe as they please, however they LOSE 33% of it. This may sound very harsh but hear me out. If we look at the Oles situation I am going to use his current tpe on his sig (824) for my calculations. If Oles wanted to switch to cb, he would lose about 280TPE, which is quite big. This would leave Oles with 544TPE to work with. Oles can still earn for a little bit and get over the 600 and maybe even the 700TPE mark if he is active. This will accomplish pretty much exactly what I am aiming for, if someone is switching to a new position they will NOT hit the ground running. They will take a huge hit in TPE and need to earn their way back into maxing their stats out. It also means that anyone who switches is not a franchise solution to the problem. As it stands now Oles can fight regression quite hard to buy time for a new qb to develop into the new starter for the Liberty. With the new system the Liberty could still stay competitive but it would be a bit harder since they moved oles. And they would have to address a new franchise quarterback much sooner since oles can't fight regression as hard. Keep in mind I haven't tested these numbers at all so whoever is reading this 66% is probably not the perfect magic number and testing would be needed to find a much better percentage.
I like the community of this league a lot. Sometimes I'll just be browsing the NSFL discord during the middle of work or browsing the forums and i'll see a joke about dermot or something beaver said about not being a fraud (which he clearly is) and I'll break out laughing. I honestly love both the Portland and Colorado locker room, the people here are awesome and I just love hanging out with this community. Even many of the media posts on the site are awesome and I love reading through analysis about players and what not. Also dermot sucks, just wanted to say that and definitely not for fluff
110
1 Removal
I think the biggest thing that needs to be addressed is the whole position switching from defensive lineman who weighs 300 pounds to a perennial all star quarterback with NO hiccups. For 1 the current system needs to be removed and replaced with a new system. I will get to that new system in the addition section but the current system has got to go. It just doesn't make any sense that a cornerback can go from all star corner to all star quarterback in one season. That is just ridiculous and it really hurts the immersion for me, at least in my experience.
1 addition
Now about the idea I had for position switching. I feel like we still need to allow people to switch positions, that way they aren't stuck in a horrible position and wanting to switch, or in the Libertys case on the brink of a playoff run when their quarterback goes inactive. My idea is that players can switch to and from any position, defensive tackle to quarterback even, however there will be a penalty. Although this plan still allows people to switch, there will be a bigger penalty than right now (which is virtually nonexistent lets be honest). My idea is that when a player switches, they can apply 66% (2/3rd) of their tpe as they please, however they LOSE 33% of it. This may sound very harsh but hear me out. If we look at the Oles situation I am going to use his current tpe on his sig (824) for my calculations. If Oles wanted to switch to cb, he would lose about 280TPE, which is quite big. This would leave Oles with 544TPE to work with. Oles can still earn for a little bit and get over the 600 and maybe even the 700TPE mark if he is active. This will accomplish pretty much exactly what I am aiming for, if someone is switching to a new position they will NOT hit the ground running. They will take a huge hit in TPE and need to earn their way back into maxing their stats out. It also means that anyone who switches is not a franchise solution to the problem. As it stands now Oles can fight regression quite hard to buy time for a new qb to develop into the new starter for the Liberty. With the new system the Liberty could still stay competitive but it would be a bit harder since they moved oles. And they would have to address a new franchise quarterback much sooner since oles can't fight regression as hard. Keep in mind I haven't tested these numbers at all so whoever is reading this 66% is probably not the perfect magic number and testing would be needed to find a much better percentage.