(10-15-2018, 11:57 AM)YoungTB Wrote:Sure the first trade might be bad in hindsight, but I don't see what there is to hate. We'll absolutely be a run first team for a couple of season while Falconi develops, so why not grab a fantastic young fullback to support the run game for a long time?
Your criticism of the second trade however, I fully disagree with. For one, you're relying on a "What if Bly leaves?" to support your argument which is kinda bogus. Bly wanted out of COL, which is completely understandable after Daybe and general mismanagement by their front office. I'm pretty sure anyone would want out of COL. Bly is coming in as easily the best DB we have right now, hell, he'll be the entire defense's leader. For a needy defense, Bly is a huge steal for us and will be essential in potentially making a run down the line. But, Bly's value for us is for something completely different; acquiring FAs. The process in of itself is a way for us to get better players and to win. We do this by tanking, and building a young core, but how do you expect Philly to sign big name FAs after missing out last season with Fyodovich and others? Well, we need to either constantly be improving or be looking like a team that can win with the help of a big name free agent. Bly along with our other acquisitions from our last two drafts, will absolutely give us wins, and I see us as a fringe playoff team this year. All of this with growth from our incredible young core, we'd need just one big name FA to be legit contenders. I'm not sure what free agency is looking like next year, but if we can get just one high earner, then Philly is suddenly looking like a great team. All of this comes back to the acquisition of a 975 TPE Bly to prime us for becoming a destination team.
I mean ...... is an IA CB really going to convince a big name FA to come to you? If that's what happens then I guess it could be correct. But I think you're underselling the chance Bly leaves. That risk alone makes it not worth a 2nd round pick.