(12-04-2018, 07:45 PM)kckolbe Wrote:1) Numbers was punished for MULTIPLE leaks to SPECIFIC individuals AFTER being warned, and received the same punishment I did.
2) There is a difference between "leaking" and "discussing" in reality. And since the rulebook does not claim that all discussion by knowledgeable individuals is considered leaking, you can't say I should have known.
3) You had the opportunity to discuss this with me as a reasonable person. You chose not to. Kindly fuck off.
1) Your punishment was actually 1/2 of what numbers was other than the fine, for the exact reasons you listed
2) Numbers used the same argument, there’s precedence here
3) I agree we should have talked to you before hand, and in the future we will be sure to do that as per due diligence. I think the reason no one did in this case was because this is such a open and shut case... you knew the results and posted a mock... kinda black and white ya know. That doesn’t make it right to not contact you, so you’re right, someone should have talked to you ahead of time. I’ll gladly F off but I’m also the only HO having a discourse with you and others about the decision. I don’t want HO to be making decisions behind closed doors and then never explaining their thought processes ya know?