(12-10-2019, 06:11 AM)shadyshoelace Wrote:That HO member said something ambiguous that did not definitively say anything as HO authority on 11/16. Dwyer's post indicated that the vote on the rule happened on 11/17. On 11/17, another HO member communicated in GM chat to the PHI GMs that the ruling was as Dwyer laid out and that the contract needed to be changed, along with the text of the updated rule. Then one of the primary instigators in this situation said "if you wanna retroactively count this with a rule that's fine."
You know the full story and you know that no matter what he felt, his timeline and complaints are objectively wrong. Perpetuating that story doesn't help anything here.
I also know that you didnt come in swinging with all this info til the person had already left chat so he himself didn't see any of it.
Talking about how a person felt as the basis of their actions and talking about facts presented later are two different things. No matter how many times you try to shove your interpretation onto his decisions.
![[Image: 68.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722696337912496132/759304283312881684/68.png)