(05-06-2020, 02:48 PM)ADwyer87 Wrote:The "no re-sim policy" was set in place with these two decisions in S17 week 1:
http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=15382
http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=15402
Essentially we found significant errors with the Austin Copperheads and chose to re-sim week 1. After this, we found errors with many teams. We could have done a re-sim of the re-sim, but that's just not really good optics, when we had people screaming in the league that they were pissed about the re-sim originally. We also could have done a full season reset, which in hindsight was likely the best option, but given the super negative public backlash for us granting a re-sim in the first place and the NSFL GMs breathing down our necks, plus the fact that no matter what we decided, it was not ideal, HO basically took the stance of just trying to put this unfortunate situation behind us and put measures in place to help going forward.
I dont know any other errors that were in besides the Lackson error, but clearly that was something bigger than I think we ever expected to happen. Was just a small mistake, it happens, but clearly a huge impact in the sim. I think that would be the big difference. Generally speaking the rule is there to stop re-sim calls for things like "hey my speed was 75 when it should be 80"
In your second link you wrote "We will not have a re-sim for any reason moving forward". And now you're doing it tho. Can HO just stay consistent and not bend the rules like they want?
Yes, there was a vote but let's be honest. If you enforce the rules you've set - you don't even need to vote. Errors have been made, it sucks but I bet that if a team that went 1:1 or 2:0 now goes 0:2 everyone will be pissed again.