I'm new to the league and all and support the re-sim but I would like to also echo what has been said by many:
You can not have a 'absolutely no re-sims' policy and then re-sim. These are mutually exclusive. I suggest you rethink that policy and clarify the procedure that will lead to a re-sim case. What was the process this time? Was it majority vote? HO exective priveledge?
My suggestion is acknowledge the need to re-sim in extra-ordinary circumstances might exist and allow for that in the rules. No need to be specific but give examples of what criteria is considered and how a decisiou would be made.
Having a rule that you pick and choose when to enforce is not a rule. At the moment the rule is 'absolutely no re-sims unless we need to re-sim'. This is garbage for obvious reasons.
You can not have a 'absolutely no re-sims' policy and then re-sim. These are mutually exclusive. I suggest you rethink that policy and clarify the procedure that will lead to a re-sim case. What was the process this time? Was it majority vote? HO exective priveledge?
My suggestion is acknowledge the need to re-sim in extra-ordinary circumstances might exist and allow for that in the rules. No need to be specific but give examples of what criteria is considered and how a decisiou would be made.
Having a rule that you pick and choose when to enforce is not a rule. At the moment the rule is 'absolutely no re-sims unless we need to re-sim'. This is garbage for obvious reasons.
Hamish MacAndrew #20 - Safety - Austin Copperheads - [Player Profile - Update Thread - Wiki page - Twitter]