05-06-2020, 09:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2020, 09:53 AM by Opera_Phantom.)
@ADwyer87, nobody (that i think off) is criticizing HO for the re-sim, especially when apparently it was voted by the DSFL GMs. What makes no sense is that we have a rule clearly stating "no re-sims". The fact that this is a completely different HO takes no part in that, or else they could pretty much go against every rule from Season 1 to Season 18 or 19, because they were not there when the rule was created.
There's a rule, it needs to be followed. Period. If going forward they want to allow for some different action by HO, either taking to a vote in HO, either a vote with the GMs affected, whatever they think it's the better action.
The point is, a rule is in place about no re-sims and they did it anyway. It makes perfect sense to do it, so just change the rule to allow it.
Edit - Besides, what was the "thing" that made HO decide "ok, we need a resim for this". When i was in Portland, my player was with wrong stats for weeks and no resim was done. So what happened this time that made this decision? We need some info about that imo.
There's a rule, it needs to be followed. Period. If going forward they want to allow for some different action by HO, either taking to a vote in HO, either a vote with the GMs affected, whatever they think it's the better action.
The point is, a rule is in place about no re-sims and they did it anyway. It makes perfect sense to do it, so just change the rule to allow it.
Edit - Besides, what was the "thing" that made HO decide "ok, we need a resim for this". When i was in Portland, my player was with wrong stats for weeks and no resim was done. So what happened this time that made this decision? We need some info about that imo.