06-21-2020, 12:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-27-2020, 09:15 PM by caltroit_red_flames.)
Submission Date: June 13th
Submission Link: Sigs
Contested Sig(s): First, for sure, I feel the rest are also too low except maybe the second. This is based on the work done that appears to go unnoticed. I feel I’m being downgraded for doing to much with the background but the amount of layers and work done shouldn’t go unnoticed even if it isn’t up to your tastes. I get my fonts aren’t as cool but I use Gimp and my computer has issues downloading outside fonts and eco wasn’t able to fix it. I personally still feel like the render is the focal point of these sigs but understand others feel different. I edited things that I think aren’t even noticed cuz I did a good job on them. The laszlo sig had a tan jacket that I think the graded thinks I just pasted and The exotic sig has a tattoo added that I thought should’ve been noted. I feel my swaps are very good. But alas, I just want these looked at and I’ll stand by the arbitration.
@Bigred1580
Sig 1 4/7
Sig 2 5/7
Sig 3 3/7 -> 4/7
Sig 4 4/7
Sig 5 3/7 -> 4/7
Total Change: $1,000,000
You put together some really interesting components in these signatures. It was agreed that they were all at least on the 4/7 level. The big things to work on would be the composition of the components and adding depth the them. Things like making lighting consistent in a way that makes it look likes it's coming from obvious sources. A great example of that comes from sig 2 which is one of the reasons it's a 5, whereas sig 4 is on the opposite end of the spectrum.
You do some great work on the renders with your swaps and cuts, I can see you getting 5's+ consistently very easily once the composition stuff is figured out!
Thank you for the arbitration submission!
Submission Link: Sigs
Contested Sig(s): First, for sure, I feel the rest are also too low except maybe the second. This is based on the work done that appears to go unnoticed. I feel I’m being downgraded for doing to much with the background but the amount of layers and work done shouldn’t go unnoticed even if it isn’t up to your tastes. I get my fonts aren’t as cool but I use Gimp and my computer has issues downloading outside fonts and eco wasn’t able to fix it. I personally still feel like the render is the focal point of these sigs but understand others feel different. I edited things that I think aren’t even noticed cuz I did a good job on them. The laszlo sig had a tan jacket that I think the graded thinks I just pasted and The exotic sig has a tattoo added that I thought should’ve been noted. I feel my swaps are very good. But alas, I just want these looked at and I’ll stand by the arbitration.
@Bigred1580
Sig 1 4/7
Sig 2 5/7
Sig 3 3/7 -> 4/7
Sig 4 4/7
Sig 5 3/7 -> 4/7
Total Change: $1,000,000
You put together some really interesting components in these signatures. It was agreed that they were all at least on the 4/7 level. The big things to work on would be the composition of the components and adding depth the them. Things like making lighting consistent in a way that makes it look likes it's coming from obvious sources. A great example of that comes from sig 2 which is one of the reasons it's a 5, whereas sig 4 is on the opposite end of the spectrum.
You do some great work on the renders with your swaps and cuts, I can see you getting 5's+ consistently very easily once the composition stuff is figured out!
Thank you for the arbitration submission!