(12-09-2020, 03:43 PM)TeyonSchavari Wrote:(12-09-2020, 03:36 PM)Raven Wrote:(12-09-2020, 03:35 PM)TeyonSchavari Wrote: Feels a bit harsh to me, but my hope is that this was done with past precedent in mind in order to keep consistency and with the thought of appeals possibly lowering the sentence. If I were HO I would have looked at the Zamir case and gone off that, which seems to be what happened. Would I have pushed for the same punishment that Zamir? Probably not. But this is what appeals is for - hope they lighten up the punishment.
Sorry Teyon this thread doesn't allow well thought out statements, you should be flinging your shit at ho as the rest of the apes
Shit you're right...heck HO
Should HO be handing out punishments with the expectation that the appeals team will lighten it up, though? Appeals are meant as a check, but I disagree that the process is best if HO just dishes out stringent punishments with the intent of appeals 'fixing' them.