(12-24-2020, 05:57 AM)Memento Mori Wrote: Appreciate the clarity on this and I’ll amend the original post to include your clarification on the appeals ruling.
However I would like to point out that DSFL HO’s interpretation of the rule was the thing we specifically appealed. I find it quite disappointing that this wasn’t considered as I guess that means the precedent that DSFL HO set has been unchallenged and the points Adam and I made about GMs being able to hold players hostage appear to apply.
challenging ho's decision on what rules means isnt really the appeals' team's area though
![[Image: 68.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722696337912496132/759304283312881684/68.png)
