(07-17-2021, 08:49 AM)Punter715 Wrote:(07-17-2021, 08:09 AM)AdamS Wrote:(07-17-2021, 02:35 AM)Jimi64 Wrote:No one's trying to deny that multiple respected users were involved as far as I can see. Generally when one points an Ace Attorney style figure to demand that someone admit something is true, there should be some leadup to that being in question first. Rather than everyone already agreeing to it ahead of time.(07-17-2021, 02:13 AM)AdamS Wrote: And I'm sorry that now there are people reacts g negatively towards others because they kept you a secret. "Oh no I liked Jiggly. Eww gross."
Don't even have a problem with Jiggly here, actually quite sympathetic to the situation and understand why a fresh start was desired.
But you can't deny some well respected users helped conspire to keep a multi account user secret when not being sure if it was legal for a whole season. Don't think that's kinda messed up? These people were in war rooms at the time of the draft, and it would take a lot of convincing to make me think that knowledge of jggly's second account wasn't used.
Now, as generally agreed by everyone, several high profile users including 3 former members of HO were approached and asked about it and all seem to have come to the conclusion that it was in good faith and not actually against the rules as they existed. I know you framed it as "not sure if legal" and all that conspiratorial negative busoness but there's usually a term for things that aren't in the rulebook. It's legal. And if it wasn't, there wouldn't be not own but two new rules making it illegal.
Is it messed up? I don't think so. I can think of some other things in the very recent past that were totally messed up though.
I wouldn't expect the league's Rita Skeeter to see the issue with stirring the pot yet again so quickly though.
Someone wanted something positive and others helped. Others who's judgement is well regarded. If you view that as a negative it's because you brought that negativity with you. Now you may go. I'm sure you have a "what entirely negative opinions about every member of HO" article to work on.
For someone who's trying to grandstand about people talking shit you're doing quite a good job of making personal and pointed attacks here. How about we don't do that? Jimi didn't come out and call people names or anything like that, he simply said, "this doesn't seem legal and feels wrong." You can simply disagree using the points you did and leave it at that. Not sure why you felt it necessary to go from conversing to attacking.
He published that bullshit and then he comes in here stirring the pot trying to paint an overly negative picture make things worse than they are. Again.
He also did NOT "simply say" it felt wrong. He straight up called people out based on it and complained about franchises being damaged and clearly generally just went way above what you're saying here.
Dudes caused nothing but damage the past few days and clearly taking/facilitating personal shots at people and you're over here tsk tsking me for not responding with perfect ladylike charm and grace while you downplay what he's doing. Pure ridiculousness.