Code:
Written option: In a recent interview with a well known print publication, the reporter suggested that they had some “dirt” on you, from your past. What could the reporter possibly have on you and how would you handle the situation?
Obviously the dirt this so called reporter has on Lavigne is from his past as a Magic The Gathering player. During his rogue years in high school, he may or may not have cheated at a game of magic the gathering in his highschools magic the gathering tournament. Lavigne may or may not have been running an energy deck and may or may not have lied about having 69 energy (nice). Lavigne had played Electrostatic Pummeler the previous turn and was now ready to attack. Lying about having 69 energy this would mean he could use Electrostatic Pummeler's ability 23 times giving his Electrostatic Pummeler an attack power of 2 to the power of 23 for a total of 8388608 damage. Again this may or may not have happened. However as the starting life total of a MTG player is 20, this damage would absolutely destroy anyone, even if they played a smelly white and green lifegain deck. His opponent might have smelled some foul play, but seeing as he did not keep count of Lavigne's energy count, he had no sure fire way of telling if Lavigne had been cheating. It was with this move that Lavinge had put himself into the position of 8-0 and winning the tournament. Ofcourse this cheating may or may not have happened and this reporter could be chatting shit.
[226 words]