(04-25-2022, 09:56 PM)Pat Wrote:(04-25-2022, 09:41 PM)infinitempg Wrote:(04-25-2022, 09:08 PM)shadyshoelace Wrote: I don't think the committee should be expected to manually check every player's activity status (although ideally they would, I get that it isn't really feasible) but when a helpful member of the community takes it upon themselves to check for them, there's really no excuse for them staying on the ballot. We slavishly stick to, like, pretty much every other rule in the book. Why is this one overlooked (I believe pretty regularly, but could be wrong)?
Diplomatic answer: Next time if I am notified, I will remove the offending players and ask the relevant parties to revote. The notice of this came after ballots were posted if I remember correctly, and so I did not have the time to do that here.
Honest answer: I’m swamped and this was not high on my priority list. I will reshuffle that list next go around to put this higher
Honest reply to your honest answer: can anyone help take some of the work off your plate? We have enough hands here to help out.
In this case it’s IRL stuff unfortunately
In terms of the process for awards on my end, I don’t even scan the names or teams to make sure they are right - I just take a preformatted sheet and paste it into a form. This normally happens before I start the draft slides, and I am thankful to have lots of help on doing the render work that comes before making the slides.