Submission Date:2/9/24
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthre...#pid773693
Contested Sigs: First
I think there was some confusion about what was original vs edited in my submission that contributed to a lower grade.
Last, here is the 3/5 vs 4/5 Grading Criteria from the Grading Scale. I think with the above, this could be considered a 4.
3/5
"Graphics that receive this grade show off that the creator has some experience creating graphics. The tools that photoshop or other editing apps provides are starting to be used, and the final product is a respectable graphic. Some flaws could be that the renders are poorly cut, text does not blend with the image, there are only include minimal changes to the background of the submission, or an unaesthetic text/font."
4/5
"Graphics that receive this grade are ones that we expected season veterans of graphics creation to make more often than not. The text blends with the rest of the signature, but the jersey swap (if applicable) and/or added logos may look a little off. This could also include text/font that does not blend well with the surrounding area, or a background that could still use more improvement."
Submission Link: https://forums.sim-football.com/showthre...#pid773693
Contested Sigs: First
I think there was some confusion about what was original vs edited in my submission that contributed to a lower grade.
- The number on the jersey is original to the image. The "MINNESOTA" is not.
- The background image was not preexisting. I created it using abstract brushes, color tool, and adjusting levels to get better contrast in the lights and shadow
Last, here is the 3/5 vs 4/5 Grading Criteria from the Grading Scale. I think with the above, this could be considered a 4.
3/5
"Graphics that receive this grade show off that the creator has some experience creating graphics. The tools that photoshop or other editing apps provides are starting to be used, and the final product is a respectable graphic. Some flaws could be that the renders are poorly cut, text does not blend with the image, there are only include minimal changes to the background of the submission, or an unaesthetic text/font."
4/5
"Graphics that receive this grade are ones that we expected season veterans of graphics creation to make more often than not. The text blends with the rest of the signature, but the jersey swap (if applicable) and/or added logos may look a little off. This could also include text/font that does not blend well with the surrounding area, or a background that could still use more improvement."