(05-04-2022, 01:23 AM)Mooty99 Wrote: No place for the QB with the best rating by far, sad
Maybe that QB should have tried playing all the snaps instead of letting that smelly guy take his playing time.
Hey judge people off the snaps they took not the snaps they didn't, smh, backwards thinking ass "voting committee"
Is this some weird version of, "you miss 100% of the shots you don't take"?
Yeah, Daytona was extremely efficient. He also had less yards and touchdowns than 13 other QBs. That's like if we said, "Ace Savage is the best RB because he had 5.2 yards per carry!" when he only carried the ball 24 times.
I am only busting your balls smh, but I believe the phrase is quality over quantity
Just curious the thought process for any that voted Cowabunga > Maxwell for first team? If it was the drops I can totally see that, almost 100 catches with no drops is pretty dang impressive
(05-10-2022, 08:59 AM)Alcott Wrote: Just curious the thought process for any that voted Cowabunga > Maxwell for first team? If it was the drops I can totally see that, almost 100 catches with no drops is pretty dang impressive
IIRC it was the dropped passes and the slight advantage in catch rate (almost 3% I believe) for Cowabunga that influenced some of the voters.
(05-10-2022, 08:59 AM)Alcott Wrote: Just curious the thought process for any that voted Cowabunga > Maxwell for first team? If it was the drops I can totally see that, almost 100 catches with no drops is pretty dang impressive
IIRC it was the dropped passes and the slight advantage in catch rate (almost 3% I believe) for Cowabunga that influenced some of the voters.
Makes sense, I can definitely see the logic behind pass catchers are supposed to catch passes thought process for the dropped passes. I may not understand the catch rate though, is it just catches/targets or does the system have some sort of quality of target metric as well? For instance is a drop evaluated the same was as a pass breakup or just regular incomplete pass, or is the system able to filter out any non-catchable passes for the stat?
(05-10-2022, 08:59 AM)Alcott Wrote: Just curious the thought process for any that voted Cowabunga > Maxwell for first team? If it was the drops I can totally see that, almost 100 catches with no drops is pretty dang impressive
IIRC it was the dropped passes and the slight advantage in catch rate (almost 3% I believe) for Cowabunga that influenced some of the voters.
Makes sense, I can definitely see the logic behind pass catchers are supposed to catch passes thought process for the dropped passes. I may not understand the catch rate though, is it just catches/targets or does the system have some sort of quality of target metric as well? For instance is a drop evaluated the same was as a pass breakup or just regular incomplete pass, or is the system able to filter out any non-catchable passes for the stat?
Oh man, if the game was complex enough to determine catchable vs uncatchable it would open up a whole new metric for us to look at! All we have at our disposal, unfortunately, is simply catches vs targets. Drops are calculated in the metric too.
I wish we had more to look at, but unfortunately we don't.