(09-02-2017, 07:20 PM)Noble Wrote:I still don't know where the numbers come out of but it's cool to look at the pretty colors!
alright I found a computer so here it is:
Wonderlic - straight up Intelligence. I took the minimum Int possible for all positions and set that to zero and set 91 as a perfect score, then just spaced them out. probably the simplest out of all of them.
40-yard dash - The 40 isnt just straight speed, part of it is accelerating out of the block, getting to your max speed, and then finishing the run. combined strength and agility to create acceleration and set that as a small percentage. then took speed and set that as the majority. Ended with Endurance for a small portion, then spaced everyone out so that it was possible to beat the 4.20 record set by John Ross, but not by too much. fastest possible time would have been a 4.16 and I believe the slowest with current starting attributes would have been 6.01, but I dont want to check.
Bench Press - Similar to the 40, but just strength and endurance. strength was the majority where a high endurance would allow players to do a couple more reps. minimum was 0 and iirc a rookie who maxes out strength in the right archetype might hit 60 reps.
Vert,broad,3 cone, shuttle - I will just tag this post again HERE so you can read, but I had to use a lot of correlations with these since we dont have stats that go along with that well. so for example, jumping requires good leg strength, so acceleration (strength x Agility) but people with high blocking stats are usually pretty heavy, so there was a bit of a minus there. No, it isnt an exact science, but it gave us something to look at. for the argument of D tackles, they actually have decent verts and broads for being so heavy. I did not have weight as a readily available stat that I could just plug in rather than type each persons in.
Please let me know if this was a helpful explanation. like I said in the other post, I dont want the exact formulas out because people will tear me apart over the most stupid stuff in it. IF the numbers dont look right, then I will change it, but I looked at a lot of data (combines from 1999-2017) and tried to normalize it as much as possible.