What do you mean by inciting drama?
If I write about how bad I think a team is would that be drama? If I write about a team and say that certain guys need to be moved/shipped out for the team to take a different direction is that drama?
A lot of this I see is 'your opinion doesn't match mine so you can't have a voice'.
Lets say a team makes a trade or signing in the off-season and it has like 3-4 pages, am I not supposed to comment on it? Is it just swept under the rug and I have to pretend the move didn't happen?
Am I not allowed to have a take on a player's decisions? A person can have a view that may not be entirely correct, just call them out on it. A lot of people slammed me for my wording in the Toriki article with the term 'selfish', 'mentally weak' etc. What am I, as a new person, supposed to think of a top tier player that only played 1 season of their contract before bouncing. There was no sign and trade and I saw no compensation for the move. How would people feel if Saquon just left the Giants after one season and NY saw no return.
It's true that I like to stir the pot but it's more so based on ...
Ashley Owens>Player fits in the NSFL, mainly used this article research to figure out what weapons teams generally need and I liked the fact he was a receiving back.
Marcella Toriki>Top young player leaving after 1 seasons since there's no real RFA here or compensation.
Rose Jenkins>Chicago probably needs to just tear it down and go in the direction of some form of rebuild unless they can have some pulling power in FA.
I hardly dislike any members and mostly goof around. I thought maybe there would be a lot of SBA/SHL cross over here so people knew what to expect but it seems not so my bad there, but I don't really see my articles as malicious. It's not some profanity laced tirade or anything, just an opinion.
If I write about how bad I think a team is would that be drama? If I write about a team and say that certain guys need to be moved/shipped out for the team to take a different direction is that drama?
A lot of this I see is 'your opinion doesn't match mine so you can't have a voice'.
Lets say a team makes a trade or signing in the off-season and it has like 3-4 pages, am I not supposed to comment on it? Is it just swept under the rug and I have to pretend the move didn't happen?
Am I not allowed to have a take on a player's decisions? A person can have a view that may not be entirely correct, just call them out on it. A lot of people slammed me for my wording in the Toriki article with the term 'selfish', 'mentally weak' etc. What am I, as a new person, supposed to think of a top tier player that only played 1 season of their contract before bouncing. There was no sign and trade and I saw no compensation for the move. How would people feel if Saquon just left the Giants after one season and NY saw no return.
It's true that I like to stir the pot but it's more so based on ...
Ashley Owens>Player fits in the NSFL, mainly used this article research to figure out what weapons teams generally need and I liked the fact he was a receiving back.
Marcella Toriki>Top young player leaving after 1 seasons since there's no real RFA here or compensation.
Rose Jenkins>Chicago probably needs to just tear it down and go in the direction of some form of rebuild unless they can have some pulling power in FA.
I hardly dislike any members and mostly goof around. I thought maybe there would be a lot of SBA/SHL cross over here so people knew what to expect but it seems not so my bad there, but I don't really see my articles as malicious. It's not some profanity laced tirade or anything, just an opinion.
[div align=\"center\"][/div]