(03-01-2018, 03:20 AM)37thchamber Wrote:My suggestion for this was to tier equipment price based on player TPE (as we do with contracts, and attributes themselves), which then doesn't increase available TPE.Haven't you learned to stay in your lane by now?
But I think the response to that was that it would be too much work for bankers (I disagree personally, and it's not like I don't know what bankers do, but whatevs)
Anyways, this is partly why I suggested the move to a more automated system for these sorts of things (updates, training etc). That way you could build a shop in PHP or something, which automatically retrieves the player's TPE and displays the correct equipment price (for example), getting around the whole "too much work" issue.
(03-01-2018, 06:49 PM)Bzerkap Wrote:Haven't you learned to stay in your lane by now?Clearly not. I impersonate a programmer for a living
Father of the League Wiki • Friendly Neighbourhood Angry Black Guy™ • NOT British
Originator of the Sim League Cinematic Universe (SLCU)
Super capitalists are parasites. Fite me.
Alternatively, if you agree, you can support a grassroots movement dedicated to educating and organising the working class by buying a digital newspaper subscription. Your support would be greatly appreciated.
My honest opinion is give it time. We are still young and there will be a time when people don't want to work for their money
(03-01-2018, 09:40 AM)124715 Wrote:I think you shouldn't be able to pay a player below their minimum, even if they did sign when they were in a lower bracket. Simple. This was the idea that the Hawks put forth that got voted down so hard. The one Hendrix referenced on the first page in the "we're the only ones that care because everyone voted down our one idea" post. The lack of support came from none of the GMs wanting forced contact changes during the life of the contract. And also it limits GMs severely. Just as taking money out of the system via stricter media payout limits or removal limits players themselves really only leads to less media. There's a weird obsession with trying to shrink what people can do. And why? (03-01-2018, 07:50 PM)AdamS Wrote:This was the idea that the Hawks put forth that got voted down so hard. The one Hendrix referenced on the first page in the "we're the only ones that care because everyone voted down our one idea" post.It's no surprise the team that benefited the most from the flawed system opposes it, even though 25% of the team's starters were mutlis for a 3 season stretch. |
|