Carryover TPE

[Supersquare04]

You reach a point where losing 200+ TPE to regression isn't worth an extra 5 TPE when recreating.  You just need to decide if you are a Kurt Warner and retire early or a Brett Favre and fight for every season you think you'll be effective.

I think carryover should be a % of your total earned throughout your career, not what you have when retiring. IF we are doing it just straight carryover %

[kckolbe]

Yup - I'm at over 1,000 TPE and makin 1M this season. I think it's ridiculous - I've tried to fix it but teams don't want it, maybe this offseason  :dontcare:

Yeah, GMs are morons everywhere. Just kidding, but you know I would love to see some salary cap changes. Though, admittedly, the transition from the current system would be all kinda awkward due to existing cheap, long term deals.

[Durden]

Yup - I'm at over 1,000 TPE and makin 1M this season. I think it's ridiculous - I've tried to fix it but teams don't want it, maybe this offseason  :dontcare:

Who cares what teams want?

That's why you have a Head Office and "board of governors" or whatever you wanna call them.

Teams/GMs will NEVER vote for something that will hurt them.

[Durden]

Yeah, GMs are morons everywhere.    Just kidding, but you know I would love to see some salary cap changes.  Though, admittedly, the transition from the current system would be all kinda awkward due to existing cheap, long term deals.

Meh. Just cut all contracts off after 3 seasons and then make people re-sign them. You'll get pushback, sure. But do you want the league to be a joke, or succeed for the long run?

[DeathOnReddit]

Yup - I'm at over 1,000 TPE and makin 1M this season. I think it's ridiculous - I've tried to fix it but teams don't want it, maybe this offseason  :dontcare:

I wouldnt say that. It just that most rules about it so far have too many problem atleast IMO.

[DeathOnReddit]

Who cares what teams want?

That's why you have a Head Office and "board of governors" or whatever you wanna call them.

Teams/GMs will NEVER vote for something that will hurt them.

Eh. We've already voted for a rule that stop TEs and RBs from being beasts at WRs. That hurt us. The rule summit has worked fine already, trying to change it now because of this contract stuff will cause more problems than solutions.

[DeathOnReddit]

I would love to see a fix to the salary cap. I have no problem voting yes to a rule that can fix it, while not having any problems that could be big.

But helllll no to carryover.

[ItsJustBarry]

I think carryover should be a % of your total earned throughout your career, not what you have when retiring.  IF we are doing it just straight carryover %

I guess my intention with keeping the carryover low-ish would be to not completely dwarf a new player. Even with a 4% on total TPE earned, that could be somewhere in the vicinity of 60 extra TPE for a 1500 TPE career which is basically an active, 10-season player. Recreating with 110 TPE and possibly a flourishing bank account could be discouraging to a player new to the site starting from scratch.

[Durden]

For reference, GOMHL rules:

-Contracts have set minimums based on TPE level as follows:
0-99 TPE: $500,000
100-149 TPE: $1,000,000
150-249 TPE: $2,000,000
250-349 TPE: $3,250,000
350-449 TPE: $4,750,000
450-500 TPE: $6,500,000

-These numbers are not maximums and can be higher.
-Max contract value is 12 million per year.
-Contracts will be adjusted if TPE levels have changed each off-season. The cut off date for TPE is at week's end of the draft. Any TPE that was earned before this will not be able to be claimed after the end of this week.

-There are no minimum contract lengths for non rookie players. Rookie contracts carry a 2 season minimum.
-Maximum contract length is 3 seasons.


Cap is 55m at the moment. And we have about 15 or so users per team?

[Durden]

Eh. We've already voted for a rule that stop TEs and RBs from being beasts at WRs. That hurt us. The rule summit has worked fine already, trying to change it now because of this contract stuff will cause more problems than solutions.

I don't know how either of those things relate to the salary cap.

Just because it'd be hard doesn't mean it shouldn't be done