(07-13-2017, 09:57 PM)daBenchwarmer Wrote:ur such a bad person @Rich:tophat:
lame af
??Soon??
@Rich
Hey, thanks for doing this. I appreciated you giving me credit for the topic suggestion. Class act. My only criticism was that you spent almost half the podcast on something that was already covered very well in a stat article (that you referenced). I would have cut that down and focused more on solutions (which were interesting) than identifying the problems. I also would have liked to hear more about your thoughts on Colorado's season. They started 6-2 and finished 2-4. Also, they ended with a negative point differential. Thanks for the comments on my build. All the other LBs (even coverage) had much higher strength, so I was pleasantly surprised when you didn't drill raising it. Also, my Int is second-highest in the league at LB, and you didn't think it was too high (something I legit feared). The idea for speed was to be able to hang with WRs across an entire zone. I plan on getting agi above 70 as well once minicamp starts. (07-15-2017, 01:24 PM)kckolbe Wrote:My only criticism was that you spent almost half the podcast on something that was already covered very well in a stat article (that you referenced). I would have cut that down and focused more on solutions (which were interesting) than identifying the problems. I also would have liked to hear more about your thoughts on Colorado's season. They started 6-2 and finished 2-4. Also, they ended with a negative point differential.Yeah, I didn't expect to spend more than 15-20 minutes on it. I hadn't really planned specifically what I was going to talk about, and I ended up getting distracted by side points too much. I actually don't think the archetype article did much other than identify that there is a problem, I wanted to try to draw more attention to it, because I think it's a pretty big problem. Like I said, I don't think there is any reason to make a corner when safeties can play the same position. I wanted to expand more on the individual CB archetype comparisons as well, because I think the article incorrectly stated the man-to-man archetype as the best, only because it takes the most TPE to max out. But I had to stop when I noticed how much time I had spent on it. Thanks for the feedback. ??Soon??
Posting PT in the media section is not common but has been happening all season. Example: http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=...indpost&p=14608
I'm not being greedy, I just ended up getting on a roll and writing way more than was necessary and I put it where it would get more visibility (because it's fun). I don't expect to get paid for it. Hank Winchester (S25 - Current) - Scrub
Angus Winchester (S1-S12) - 4x Ultimus Champ - #2 Career Sacks - Hall of Fame
Cooter Bigsby (S14-S23) - S23 Ultimus Champ - #4 Career Yards - #4 Career TDs - 2x MVP - Hall of Fame
(07-15-2017, 01:55 PM)timeconsumer Wrote:Posting PT in the media section is not common but has been happening all season. Example: http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=...indpost&p=14608I remembered seeing it before at least once, didn't know if it got graded or not. ??Soon??
(07-15-2017, 04:00 PM)Rich Wrote:I remembered seeing it before at least once, didn't know if it got graded or not. So why come off with this "holier than thou" tone on me? Hank Winchester (S25 - Current) - Scrub
Angus Winchester (S1-S12) - 4x Ultimus Champ - #2 Career Sacks - Hall of Fame
Cooter Bigsby (S14-S23) - S23 Ultimus Champ - #4 Career Yards - #4 Career TDs - 2x MVP - Hall of Fame
|
|