(07-27-2017, 10:17 AM)Destroyer Wrote:I never took anybody's opinion and feedback personally or defensively until he said that I am trying to become a Master and have puppets and want to have unilateral power. That's literally the opposite of "Genuine". When I explicitly stated before that none of that is the case.
Now, I have no problem with there being an election man. I was just stating why I believe an election is un-necessary.
So my question to you is...what red flag are you seeing? Just genuinely curious.
Gotcha...just misunderstood your tone, my bad
The red flag was that it seems like you're putting yourself in a high position without taking into account the player's opinions. I know you said it's just for the beginning and afterwards the members would have the power to vote you out if they want, but I do think that it sets a bad precedent.
Also the fact that this doesn't seem to be structured the same as IRL PAs makes me a little cautious...PAs typically also have an elected representative from each team. A core group of 3 executives seems too small to be an accurate representation of all the members (if that's indeed what the goal is...a small leadership group where one of them is self-appointed seems a bit like a power grab tbh)
I would still like to be a member, but I'll need to see how seriously you / the presidents take getting players and members involved in the discussion, especially if you go ahead and set the precedent of establishing yourself as CEO without taking anybody else's views into account.
Hopefully that makes sense, and I appreciate you asking for feedback. Right now I think this is a 10/10 idea with a 5/10 execution, but I'm open to having my mind changed