Tier 3 #22
The way awards committee works right now is, each team gets a representative, and it is their job to collectively determine the five or so players nominated for each award. However, based on this structure, each representative feels their main responsibility is to get the player from their team onto the ballot, rather than to get the 5 best candidates nominated. With everyone acting in their own self interest, the ballot selection can often be overly swayed by which representative can talk the most, loudest, and longest. In my experience in the committee another thing that I have noticed is that the longer that a discussion about a group of players lasts, the more likely it is that people lose sight of the objective and get lost in the details (see: Cole Maxwell not getting nominated for offensive rookie of the year despite having the most prolific season for a rookie wide receiver ever).
So my solution to both the problems of overly drawn out conversations and of people just talking more to get their point across is: keep the one representative per team structure, but now the process for nominating someone for an award is to write up a paragraph (or whatever it takes) explaining why they deserve it. After all nominations are in, there is no further discussion. Representatives read all the explanations and make their decisions via vote. And to keep things as objective as possible, representatives are not allowed to vote for the players on their own team.
The way awards committee works right now is, each team gets a representative, and it is their job to collectively determine the five or so players nominated for each award. However, based on this structure, each representative feels their main responsibility is to get the player from their team onto the ballot, rather than to get the 5 best candidates nominated. With everyone acting in their own self interest, the ballot selection can often be overly swayed by which representative can talk the most, loudest, and longest. In my experience in the committee another thing that I have noticed is that the longer that a discussion about a group of players lasts, the more likely it is that people lose sight of the objective and get lost in the details (see: Cole Maxwell not getting nominated for offensive rookie of the year despite having the most prolific season for a rookie wide receiver ever).
So my solution to both the problems of overly drawn out conversations and of people just talking more to get their point across is: keep the one representative per team structure, but now the process for nominating someone for an award is to write up a paragraph (or whatever it takes) explaining why they deserve it. After all nominations are in, there is no further discussion. Representatives read all the explanations and make their decisions via vote. And to keep things as objective as possible, representatives are not allowed to vote for the players on their own team.