Kansas City Ineligible Player Punishment

[BRNXB0MBERS]

What if we simply fold the league?

[ReverendOReily]

when does this break the record for the longest punishment thread?

Are you kidding me? We haven't even topped the last controversial KCC GM punishment thread (shoutout @soevil for still being around today to shitpost in this thread)

But to answer your question, 80-something replies

EDIT: thread moving so fast, this was the reply that tied

[Pat]

The issue with re-simming is the effort involved, changing a file is much less work.

Its been said in this thread that it isn't a option to just go in and change data... So it would have to be a re-sim which wont happen.

I understand what was said, but given I have some programming knowledge and have edited files in a plethora of games, I find it hard to believe we can't change a win to a loss in 15 minutes or less given some of the extremely savvy users in here.

Give it a go for us and see what happens.

[TheRake]

What if we simply fold the league?

More reasonable than docking a draft pick tbh

[TheRake]

The issue with re-simming is the effort involved, changing a file is much less work.

Its been said in this thread that it isn't a option to just go in and change data... So it would have to be a re-sim which wont happen.

I understand what was said, but given I have some programming knowledge and have edited files in a plethora of games, I find it hard to believe we can't change a win to a loss in 15 minutes or less given some of the extremely savvy users in here.

Give it a go for us and see what happens.

Put up a $1bil bounty and I'll have it fixed by tonight

[Beck]

Why does KCC get a pick taken when Hon has so many of them. A Fair punishment would be to have Hon forefit their newly acquired picks to the original teams that had them. #FreeKCC

[Bamford13]

The issue with re-simming is the effort involved, changing a file is much less work.

Its been said in this thread that it isn't a option to just go in and change data... So it would have to be a re-sim which wont happen.

I understand what was said, but given I have some programming knowledge and have edited files in a plethora of games, I find it hard to believe we can't change a win to a loss in 15 minutes or less given some of the extremely savvy users in here.

Give it a go for us and see what happens.

Put up a $1bil bounty and I'll have it fixed by tonight

I’ll give you my 200M if you can do it

[g2019]

It's been 16 pages of talking in circles, can we stop addressing the matter at hand and strictly pasta at this point?

[platanocat]

[UptownCord]

Just for a little bit of clarity, Re-Sims are determined by HO, not the Sim Team. HO determined a re-sim was not appropriate here. The decision was appealed and the appeals team upheld that decision. Also, at this point, we would have to re-sim 3 weeks (we can't just re-do the one game/week in question). I am in no way providing an opinion on whether I think a re-sim was appropriate here or not. I'm only trying to point out why one was not done and that, at this point, it's really not feasible. And likely would upset some rookies bc all stats would be changed, which I'm not a fan of.

This is a little incorrect.

The re-sim was appealed, but appeals team did not upheld that decision, it was ISFL HO. Appeals didnt hear the case, as I mention earlier based on the turnaround time involved and the nature of it being a resim. It was discussed with appeals (atto) after, and did agree that its a topic that with no rules governing it, doesn't really present itself as an area for appeals to judge with a path to follow and handle such a case.

Not trying to trash HO for stepping in, but the Appeals Team needs to be easily reachable and able to form a timely group decision due to the serious nature of punishments. Some of these members we know and love, but others aren't really active. Some haven't been seen this week, one other hasn't been on the site since November. This department needs to be better.