(10-20-2017, 02:35 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:The highest TPE player in the league would probably be a better approach.
Once the average of top 10 players any position breaks x amount?
(10-20-2017, 04:36 PM)Official DT Wrote:Sorry We didn't draft you. You were already there. Hank Winchester (S25 - Current) - Scrub
Angus Winchester (S1-S12) - 4x Ultimus Champ - #2 Career Sacks - Hall of Fame
Cooter Bigsby (S14-S23) - S23 Ultimus Champ - #4 Career Yards - #4 Career TDs - 2x MVP - Hall of Fame
(10-20-2017, 04:35 PM)ErMurazor Wrote:The highest TPE player in the league would probably be a better approach. Approved. Hank Winchester (S25 - Current) - Scrub
Angus Winchester (S1-S12) - 4x Ultimus Champ - #2 Career Sacks - Hall of Fame
Cooter Bigsby (S14-S23) - S23 Ultimus Champ - #4 Career Yards - #4 Career TDs - 2x MVP - Hall of Fame
(10-20-2017, 12:39 PM)7hawk77 Wrote:Alright. This is my current proposed solution. I'd like to hear from the OL and GM's. This seems to be a good way to solve most issues with line play in the league so far, good job. I think the league should offer free positional changes to existing O lineman aswell. This is changing the equations in players minds about creating new linemen, and we have four season of recruitment material built up saying “MAKE A LINEMAN YOU ARE NEEDED.” Now you can just budget properly and buy a great line. To say, well now you need to write $4mil to get out of the position we are doing or best to make unnecessary seems ridiculous. Let the hostages escape. In my mind this is a bigger Crisis than the overflow of QB’s in S1. [img src=\"http://i.imgur.com/lVbzvTH.png\" height=\"200px\" width=\"400px\" /]
(10-20-2017, 01:39 PM)automatic Wrote:This seems to be a good way to solve most issues with line play in the league so far, good job. I think the league should offer free positional changes to existing O lineman aswell. This is changing the equations in players minds about creating new linemen, and we have four season of recruitment material built up saying “MAKE A LINEMAN YOU ARE NEEDED.” I'm glad @timeconsumer got you in line. You were retiring a few days ago. :rofl:
[div align=\"center\"][/div]
Really we need more GM's signing off on this idea since they will have extra budgeting, bot creation and duties.
However, I'm sure this will be preferred to the crippling depression that follows when the only OL gets taken first overall by another team. Edit: Too soon? (10-20-2017, 03:29 PM)7hawk77 Wrote:Also for the record. This is VERY true. I totally agree. |
|