*In Defense of the Indefensible

[cosbornballboy]

@Deusolis This reeks of former debater hahaha

[enigmatic]

If he is welcomed back, I'd actually consider going inactive because I'm getting extremely annoyed by the negativity he brings to every single league he's on and I'm even disgusted by his behaviour. What he did with the TPE, especially considering his past history, which is known by all of us, is inexcusable. If people can just bend the rules and do despicable shit and then whine about their punishment enough to be welcomed back, I'm sorry, but this isn't a community I have any interest in being a part of.

All he ever brings is drama to every sim league he is on. I can't be the only one who is tired of his shit. I'm not here to read the Carson/Noble/whatever Saga, I'm here to have fun.

[timeconsumer]

Additionally, this does seem to be a rather classic case of piling on. As has been mentioned, RainDelay and I share an IP address when we’re at school, as do three other users. Setting a standard in which the black sheep is slaughtered for sharing an IP but model members aren’t given a second thought is concerning to me. The fact that RainDelay and I are in good standing while Noble is not, is a result of our respective actions. Noble obviously has a much spottier record than either of us. But the fact remains that the same basic set of evidence – multiple accounts emanating from one IP address – should produce the same investigation and, in most cases, the same result. While there is other circumstantial evidence in the case of Noble’s account, it appears that the decision was made long before that evidence was taken into account.

http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=29&st=42

You guys followed the rules. That is why there is no punishment.

Noble did not. And let me remind you he knows exactly what this thread is for:

http://nsfl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=...indpost&p=36571

[Deusolis]

Fair enough, just used to friends in law school bringing up random legal stuff they have a tenuous grasp on in places where it has no bearing. Not saying that's necessarily what happened, just that that's how it came across on a quick glance.

Lmaoo I completely get what you're saying even though I'm pretty sure I have it right but if any actual con. Law folks want to correct me by all means. That test was just the easiest way to nail down a more general concept.

[Sweetwater]

Lmaoo I completely get what you're saying even though I'm pretty sure I have it right but if any actual con. Law folks want to correct me by all means. That test was just the easiest way to nail down a more general concept.

In case it wasn't clear, I don't know anything about constitutional law, just know a group of not yet lawyers, and they love showing off about how much more law they know lol

What you had stated of it made sense and it was something I think most of the experienced users had already considered the rule as passing that test.

[Beaver]

This was a good read, nice arguments. I do think there's enough doubt about dusty to be a bit more lenient even considering Noble's history, though I'm not sold on allowing multis for reasons already discussed.

[RainDelay]

In case it wasn't clear, I don't know anything about constitutional law, just know a group of not yet lawyers, and they love showing off about how much more law they know lol

What you had stated of it made sense and it was something I think most of the experienced users had already considered the rule as passing that test.

All the not-yet-lawyers that @Deusolis and I know just love showing off how they can get ejected from a basketball game and complain about it afterwards.

[Sweetwater]

All the not-yet-lawyers that @Deusolis and I know just love showing off how they can get ejected from a basketball game and complain about it afterwards.

Oh yeah, they love intentionally getting in trouble so they can argue.