Why tamper when you can pamper
RIP BOZO
In greek mythology there was a god know as Icarus, The inventer of daedalus. He flew close to the sun despite the waxed wings. Ajax took an "Icarus" approach, Testing all his opportunties to t word, taking the opportunity to fly just close enough to the sun while having that waxxed wing still attached. But sadly that waxxed wing was more fragile then he thought or perhaps he just flew too close or even flew directly to the sun? Ajax the sun flyer. "...and has what is honestly the most bizarre attachment to ISFL fantasy football and user bets..." - aeonsjenni (07-26-2023, 01:15 PM)CROney3 Wrote: RIP BOZO Nice to see the league hasn't forgotten about this one
You could easily argue that Ajax was a tamper merchant and only had so many prior warnings due to the efficiency of his ability to get into users' DMs. His 4.3 tampers per message shows that he was not an efficient tamperer and there are negatives to his game. As for the better supporting cast statement, sure you can argue LB had a better supporting cast, but saying that doesn’t really matter when there are no negatives to LB's tampering game outside of choking in the casino (good thing user bets don't matter for punishments). Don’t get me wrong I see the argument that he deserves a title as a top tier tamperer I just think it’s a fairly substantially weaker argument than LB's case.
(07-26-2023, 01:43 PM)Pat Wrote: You could easily argue that Ajax was a tamper merchant and only had so many prior warnings due to the efficiency of his ability to get into users' DMs. His 4.3 tampers per message shows that he was not an efficient tamperer and there are negatives to his game. As for the better supporting cast statement, sure you can argue LB had a better supporting cast, but saying that doesn’t really matter when there are no negatives to LB's tampering game outside of choking in the casino (good thing user bets don't matter for punishments). Don’t get me wrong I see the argument that he deserves a title as a top tier tamperer I just think it’s a fairly substantially weaker argument than LB's case. Who gave you permissions to shitpost
07-26-2023, 02:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2023, 02:54 PM by ZootTX. Edited 1 time in total.)
(07-26-2023, 01:43 PM)Pat Wrote: You could easily argue that Ajax was a tamper merchant and only had so many prior warnings due to the efficiency of his ability to get into users' DMs. His 4.3 tampers per message shows that he was not an efficient tamperer and there are negatives to his game. As for the better supporting cast statement, sure you can argue LB had a better supporting cast, but saying that doesn’t really matter when there are no negatives to LB's tampering game outside of choking in the casino (good thing user bets don't matter for punishments). Don’t get me wrong I see the argument that he deserves a title as a top tier tamperer I just think it’s a fairly substantially weaker argument than LB's case. epic From Sophocle's Ajax Quote:Alas, thou darkness, my sole light! O thou nether gloom, fairer for me than any sunshine! take me to dwell with you,—yea, take me; for I am no longer worthy to look for help to the race of the gods, or for any good from men, the children of a day. |
|