With Chess' contract extension, @kckolbe brought up a good point. The contract is listed as the vet minimum for a sub-400TPE player. However, with this upcoming update, Chess would be past 400TPE and the contract, were he to sign in s5 as opposed to last week, would be 2m. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples, but basiclally this is what I purpose:
If the contract for the year is below the minumum based on TPE for that year, that contract is then raised to the new floor.
So for example, if we make it so Chess signed in s4 rather than s5 for the same amounts as listed it would be as following
s4 -1m
s5 -1m
s6 -1m
s7 -1m
However, if he broke 400TPE in s5 this would become
s4 -1m
s5 -2m
s6 -2m
s7 -2m
because he passed the floor that was set for sub 400TPE
However, as a lot of teams have already made and finalized their budgets for this season I ask that thsi be implemented starting s5
If the contract for the year is below the minumum based on TPE for that year, that contract is then raised to the new floor.
So for example, if we make it so Chess signed in s4 rather than s5 for the same amounts as listed it would be as following
s4 -1m
s5 -1m
s6 -1m
s7 -1m
However, if he broke 400TPE in s5 this would become
s4 -1m
s5 -2m
s6 -2m
s7 -2m
because he passed the floor that was set for sub 400TPE
However, as a lot of teams have already made and finalized their budgets for this season I ask that thsi be implemented starting s5
[div align=center]
[SIZE=4]Player Page || Anoa'i Update Page ||
Quote:We didn't reach out because we didn't want you.
[SIZE=4]Player Page || Anoa'i Update Page ||
Quote:everyone’s favorite mediocre wide receiver, Darren Smallwood.[/align]