S27 DSFL Rules Summit Results

[TomHanks]

The S27 DSFL Rules Summit has recently come to a close.  GMs, Head Office members and the DSFL Simmer were encouraged to submit proposed changes to the rulebook and league procedure. With 15 voting members (8 teams, 4 HO members, 1 league commissioner, 1 league owner, and 1 simmer), 10 votes were needed for a proposal to pass.

Below is the full list of proposed rule changes and the final voting results for each.

1. If a mid-season call-up brings a position below the minimum needed for DCs, the team should be able to create an emergency 50 TPE filler bot regardless of what point in the season it is.

15 For - 0 Against
Rule Passes

2. DSFL GMs may not suggest or encourage any send-down player to position switch without first obtaining permission from the send-down player's ISFL GM. Any violations of this rule are to be considered tampering and may be punished as such at Head Office's discretion.

9 For - 6 Against
Rule Does Not Pass

Code:

DSFL Rule 1 passes. Rule 1 will be added to the rulebook and will go into effect during the off-season.

Please feel free to tag @TomHanks with any questions!

[124715]

Kinda wish rule 2 would've passed, idrc for the tampering punishment but that would be a useful communication to have

[gucci]

Kinda wish rule 2 would've passed, idrc for the tampering punishment but that would be a useful communication to have

Agreed, this should be common sense imo, but apparently it isn’t so a rule should be added in.

[excelsior]

Fight! Fight! Fight!

[Billybolo53]

!thor