(04-05-2018, 12:53 PM)SwagSloth Wrote:I get the nature of this and I think its intentions are good. However, anytime we allow someone to earn TPE/$$$ on behalf of another player, it just turns into teams helping themselves out and/or GMs getting around contracts. For example, media payments used to be able to be redirected, but now you have to prove that someone contributed to split payment. Another example would be a GM saying "Listen, I can't pay you more than X, but I'll write media to get you 3x that".
If this passed, no wraith will ever miss a TPE or need money to train and we'd be able to pay everyone minimum. Like I said, it's well-intended, but we've run into issues with similar ideas before.
This is a big reason why I don't like it. If this was implemented I'd be able to keep every inactive/fringe active I could get in contact with as a max earner, laying out how to implement their tpe and basically doing everything for them. It would make it easy for teams to keep inactives active as long as they could just get them on to update.
[div align=center]
[div align=center]
[div align=center]