I think theres some stuff i just am not sure about.
Obviously new members should be taken easy, because this should be fun and relaxed.
But that doesnt mean ramp up the difficulty to 10 on the experienced guys! Thats sjust wrong and takes a lot of fun out of the league, especially when that same sig given to a guy thats "good" but not great would get a 5.
I think also, just arguing on specifics, that grade you gave just seems wrong. "The text works although plain." text doesnt have to be fancy, if it works it works. "The low opacity 2nd render works decent .. its just not right and I cant seem to come up with the vocabulary to explain it." Thats where you lose me. Now of course i think this sig is dope, looks better than most sigs i get made for me, so maybe im partially biased. But I just dont get what you're saying here. it works but its not right? I mean whats wrong with it? imo, if something doesnt FEEL right, thats not enough to take off a point, or even two, especially if you cant find the words to roperly explain why you took them off. maybe give it a 4.5, but not a 3. Not going to make assumptions, but it just seems like you recognize that the sig is good, it works, and is skillfully made, but personally dont like the effects used and therefore gave it a bad rating. If thats the case thats not good. With the one you gave a 4, i do really see where you're coming from, that C does make it look rough. but still seems very harsh to me. What also makes me wonder is every comment in there was talking about how fire the sigs were....including your comment saying they were sick! that just confuses me.
Anyways, I'm not here to say whether media or graphics is easier, or to call you names, you know i respect you, we are teammates in SHL, have worked together in the past and even currently a bit on the "secret" project. But at the same time these grades seem confusing and unfair, and as 701's GM its my job to stick up for him when he doesn't get correct compensation for his efforts.
Obviously new members should be taken easy, because this should be fun and relaxed.
But that doesnt mean ramp up the difficulty to 10 on the experienced guys! Thats sjust wrong and takes a lot of fun out of the league, especially when that same sig given to a guy thats "good" but not great would get a 5.
I think also, just arguing on specifics, that grade you gave just seems wrong. "The text works although plain." text doesnt have to be fancy, if it works it works. "The low opacity 2nd render works decent .. its just not right and I cant seem to come up with the vocabulary to explain it." Thats where you lose me. Now of course i think this sig is dope, looks better than most sigs i get made for me, so maybe im partially biased. But I just dont get what you're saying here. it works but its not right? I mean whats wrong with it? imo, if something doesnt FEEL right, thats not enough to take off a point, or even two, especially if you cant find the words to roperly explain why you took them off. maybe give it a 4.5, but not a 3. Not going to make assumptions, but it just seems like you recognize that the sig is good, it works, and is skillfully made, but personally dont like the effects used and therefore gave it a bad rating. If thats the case thats not good. With the one you gave a 4, i do really see where you're coming from, that C does make it look rough. but still seems very harsh to me. What also makes me wonder is every comment in there was talking about how fire the sigs were....including your comment saying they were sick! that just confuses me.
Anyways, I'm not here to say whether media or graphics is easier, or to call you names, you know i respect you, we are teammates in SHL, have worked together in the past and even currently a bit on the "secret" project. But at the same time these grades seem confusing and unfair, and as 701's GM its my job to stick up for him when he doesn't get correct compensation for his efforts.