I'm not completely opposed to the idea, but this is a subjective take on something that when accumulated over time could really benefit one team over another...who is the person making that judgement? Can we trust them to really remain objective? Or could they be subconsciously picking their own team a disproportionate amount of the time, because humans? What about people that aren't well-liked by a large portion of the leadership in the league? Even if they write or draw up an excellent piece, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect that the bias against them for unrelated reasons makes it far less likely they get chosen.
Subjective judgements in some things in this league are unavoidable. But bonus cash for media or graphics is one thing, bonus TPE is very different. I would say that if this is done a lot of thought needs to be put into reducing the subjectivity and subconscious bias.
Subjective judgements in some things in this league are unavoidable. But bonus cash for media or graphics is one thing, bonus TPE is very different. I would say that if this is done a lot of thought needs to be put into reducing the subjectivity and subconscious bias.
Hank Winchester (S25 - Current) - Scrub
Angus Winchester (S1-S12) - 4x Ultimus Champ - #2 Career Sacks - Hall of Fame
Cooter Bigsby (S14-S23) - S23 Ultimus Champ - #4 Career Yards - #4 Career TDs - 2x MVP - Hall of Fame