Imagine having an award that is meant to identify outstanding users in our community and putting a joke candidate on there. Disrespectful to those that work hard and coulda been used to give one more user at least some sort of recognition that their dedication has been noticed and appreciated. If Brooks was written down as a nominee at first and HO nixed it and told everyone to put down someone else they feel is deserving, I think that would have been a better course of action. After all, aren't only actives allowed to be voted on for player awards? Why would user awards be any different?
At the end of the day its harmless and a deserving member of our community won, I just feel that this was not the right place for it and another active member of our community could have been represented as a nominee. Sorry to be a fun hater
At the end of the day its harmless and a deserving member of our community won, I just feel that this was not the right place for it and another active member of our community could have been represented as a nominee. Sorry to be a fun hater