(07-29-2024, 02:17 AM)Megsychan Wrote:I'm of the camp that would advocate for a re-sim, but wouldn't rule out an auto-loss. GMs need to be held accountable. That is viewed as extreme by many though, so for now I'd settle for a bigger fine, say $9M-$12M.(07-27-2024, 05:27 PM)g2019 Wrote: Real talk tho, I feel like fines need to be higher for these. $3M is literally only a quarter of what a GM makes for GMing one season, and GMs need to be able to know who is eligible and who is not, especially coming into an entirely new season.
What about vacating wins that involve ineligible players? Or is that too harsh?
Messages In This Thread |
London Ineligible Player - by woelkers - 07-27-2024, 04:05 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by Gadget - 07-27-2024, 04:08 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by Triceracop - 07-27-2024, 04:08 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by g2019 - 07-27-2024, 04:36 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by g2019 - 07-27-2024, 05:27 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by Megsychan - 07-29-2024, 02:17 AM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by g2019 - 07-29-2024, 08:50 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by Assistant to the POR GM - 07-27-2024, 05:57 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by ReverendOReily - 07-29-2024, 07:08 AM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by Soviet Sexpot - 07-29-2024, 01:50 PM
RE: London Ineligible Player - by CROney3 - 07-29-2024, 02:45 PM
|